LinkedIn

Tuesday, April 2, 2024

CONDITION MONITORING (PREDICTIVE) MAINTENANCE

 2.4. CONDITION MONITORING (PREDICTIVE) MAINTENANCE

By Aleksandar Pudar

Technical Superintendent and Planned Maintenance Supervisor Reederei Nord BV

Co-founder of "Out of Box Maritime Thinker Blog" and Founder of Naro Consilium Group

Predictive maintenance is a critical maintenance strategy in the marine industry but is often misunderstood and misused. Many believe that it is only used to prevent catastrophic failure of critical equipment or as a maintenance scheduling tool that uses data such as vibration and infrared or lubricating oil analysis to determine the need for corrective maintenance actions. However, these definitions limit the potential benefits of predictive maintenance and often fail to achieve a marked decrease in maintenance costs or measurable improvement in overall vessel performance.

Predictive maintenance in the marine industry is much more than a maintenance scheduling tool and should not be restricted to maintenance management. Instead, it should be part of an integrated, total vessel performance management program that can improve the production capacity, product quality, and effectiveness of the vessel's equipment and machinery. Predictive maintenance can reduce breakdown losses, quality defects, capacity factors, and maintenance costs by monitoring the condition of equipment and detecting potential issues before they lead to equipment failure. This strategy can also improve safety, reduce environmental impact, and increase the reliability and efficiency of the vessel's equipment and machinery.

It is essential to recognise that predictive maintenance is not a panacea for all problems in vessel maintenance management. Instead, it is just one tool that should be integrated with other maintenance strategies and overall vessel management practices. By implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program that includes various techniques such as vibration monitoring, thermography, tribology, electric motor analysis, visual inspection, ultrasonic monitoring, and operating dynamics analysis, vessel owners and operators can ensure the safety, reliability, and efficiency of their equipment and machinery.

2.4.1  DEFINITION OF PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE

Predictive maintenance regularly evaluates vessel equipment and machinery operating conditions as a management technique to optimise total vessel operation. It is important to note that predictive maintenance is not a panacea for all factors that limit total vessel performance, and it cannot directly affect vessel performance. The output of a predictive maintenance program is data, and action must be taken to resolve the deviations or problems revealed by the program before vessel performance can be improved. Therefore, a management philosophy committed to vessel improvement must exist before any meaningful benefit can be derived.

Properly used, predictive maintenance can identify most if not all, factors that limit the effectiveness and efficiency of the total vessel. Predictive technology can be used for much more than just measuring the operating condition of critical vessel machinery. The technology permits accurate evaluation of all functional groups within the company, such as maintenance. However, without the absolute commitment and support of senior management and the full cooperation of all vessel functions, a predictive maintenance program cannot provide the means to resolve poor vessel performance.

 

2.4.1.1 CONDITION MONITORING (PREDICTIVE) MAINTENANCE

2.4.1.1.1 POTENTIAL FAILURE (P-F) DIAGRAM

Although many failure modes are not age-related, most of them give some warning that they are in the process of occurring or about to occur. If evidence can be found that something is in the final stages of a failure, it may be possible to take action to prevent it from failing and/or to avoid the consequences. Section 4, Figure 1 illustrates the final stages of failure, called the P-F curve. Section 4, Figure 1 illustrates how a condition deteriorates to the point at which it can be detected (Point P) and then, if it is not detected and corrected, continues to deteriorate until it reaches the point of functional failure (Point F). In practice, there are many ways of determining whether failures are in the process of occurring (e.g., hot spots showing deterioration of furnace refractories or electrical insulation, vibrations indicating imminent bearing failure, increasing level of contaminants in lubricating oil). If a potential failure is detected between Point P and Point F, it may be possible to take action to prevent the functional failure (or at least to minimise the effects). Tasks designed to detect potential failure are known as condition-monitoring tasks.

2.4.1.1.2 THE P-F INTERVAL

The time interval between Point P and Point F in Section 4, Figure 1 is called the "P-F interval"; this is

the warning period (e.g., the time between the point at which the potential failure becomes detectable and the point at which it deteriorates into a functional failure). If a condition-monitoring task is performed on

intervals longer than the P-F interval, the potential failure may not be detected. On the other hand, if the condition-monitoring task is performed too frequently compared to the P-F interval, resources are wasted. For example, if the inspection interval is once per month and the P-F interval is six (6) months, the time between the discovery of the potential failure and the occurrence of the functional failure is five (5) months; this is sometimes known as the available P-F interval. For a condition-monitoring task to be technically feasible, the available P-F interval must be longer than required to take action to prevent the functional failure (or minimise its effects). It should be noted that the P-F interval can vary in practice, and in some cases, it can be very inconsistent. A task interval substantially less than the shortest of the likely P-F intervals should be selected in these cases.

2.4.2 VESSEL MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT

Vessel maintenance management involves managing vessel maintenance activities to ensure equipment and machinery's safety, reliability, and efficiency; this includes maintenance management, machinery/equipment operation management, maintenance quality improvement, and predictive maintenance techniques.

Properly used, predictive maintenance can provide the means to eliminate all factors that limit vessel performance. One factor that limits the effective management of vessels is the lack of timely, factual data that define the operating conditions of critical production systems and the effectiveness of critical vessel functions, such as purchasing, engineering, and production. High maintenance costs in the marine industry are the direct result of inherent problems throughout the vessel, not just ineffective maintenance management. Poor design standards and purchasing practices, improper operation, and outdated management methods contribute more to high operations and maintenance costs than delays caused by the catastrophic failure of critical vessel machinery.

Because of the breakdown mentality and myopic view of the root cause of ineffective vessel performance, too many vessels restrict predictive maintenance to the maintenance function. Expansion of the program to include regular evaluation of all factors that limit vessel performance will significantly enhance the benefits that can be derived. In a full vessel performance mode, predictive technology can accurately measure the effectiveness and efficiency of all vessel functions, not just machinery. In addition, the data generated by regular evaluation can isolate specific limitations in skill levels, inadequate procedures, poor management methods, and incipient machine or process system problems.

By implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program that includes various techniques such as vibration monitoring, thermography, tribology, electric motor analysis, visual inspection, ultrasonic monitoring, and operating dynamics analysis, vessel owners and operators can ensure the safety, reliability, and efficiency of their equipment and machinery. Predictive maintenance can reduce breakdown losses, quality defects, capacity factors, and maintenance costs. This strategy can also improve safety, reduce environmental impact, and increase the reliability and efficiency of the vessel's equipment and machinery.

2.4.2.1 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT

Maintenance management involves planning, scheduling, and executing maintenance activities to ensure equipment meets the required standards. It includes maintenance planning, work order management, asset management, inventory management, and maintenance reporting.

As a maintenance management tool, predictive maintenance can provide the data required to schedule preventive and corrective maintenance tasks on an as-needed basis for vessel equipment and machinery. Instead of relying on average-life statistics, such as mean-time-to-failure, to schedule maintenance activities, predictive maintenance uses direct monitoring of the operating condition, system efficiency, and other indicators to determine the actual mean-time-to-failure or loss of efficiency for each machinery and system on board.

A comprehensive predictive maintenance program can provide factual data that define the actual mechanical condition of each machinery train and the operating efficiency of each process system on board the vessel. These data can be used to schedule maintenance activities and minimise unscheduled breakdowns of all mechanical equipment on the vessel while ensuring that repaired equipment is in acceptable mechanical condition.

To achieve these goals, the predictive maintenance program must correctly identify the root cause of incipient problems in the machinery and systems on board the vessel. Furthermore, the predictive maintenance program must be combined with a viable maintenance planning function to use the data to plan and schedule appropriate repairs. In addition, it depends on the skill and knowledge of maintenance craftsmen. Both ineffective planning and improper repairs will severely restrict the benefits of predictive maintenance.

Predictive maintenance utilising vibration signature analysis is predicated on standard failure modes having distinct vibration frequency components that can be isolated and identified. In addition, predictive maintenance utilising process efficiency, heat loss, or other nondestructive techniques can quantify the operating efficiency of nonmechanical plant equipment or systems. Combined with vibration analysis, these techniques can provide the maintenance manager or marine engineer with factual information that will enable them to achieve optimum reliability and availability from their vessel equipment and machinery.

Proper implementation of predictive maintenance can minimise maintenance costs and increase vessel efficiency and reliability. However, it is essential to note that predictive maintenance cannot function in a void and must be integrated into a comprehensive maintenance management program that encompasses all factors that limit the effectiveness and efficiency of vessel equipment and machinery.

2.4.2.1.1 CONDITION-MONITORING MAINTENANCE TASK APPLICABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS

For a condition-monitoring maintenance task to be considered applicable and practical, the following considerations must be made:

·         The onset of failure must be detectable. There must be some measurable parameter that can detect the deterioration in the equipment's condition. In addition, maintenance personnel must be able to establish limits to determine when corrective action is needed.

·         Reasonably consistent P-F interval. The P-F interval must be consistent enough to ensure that corrective actions are not implemented prematurely or that failure occurs before corrective actions are implemented.

·         Practical interval in which condition-monitoring tasks can be performed. The P-F interval must be sufficient to permit a practical task interval. For example, a failure with a P-F interval of minutes or hours is probably not a good candidate for a condition-monitoring maintenance task.

·         Sufficient warning so that corrective actions can be implemented. The P-F interval must be long enough to implement corrective actions. This can be determined by subtracting the task interval from the expected P-F interval and then judging whether sufficient time remains to take necessary corrective actions.

·         Reduces the probability of failure (and therefore the risk) to an acceptable level. The tasks must be carried out at an interval so that the probability of failure allows an acceptable risk level to be achieved. Agreed-upon risk acceptance criteria should be determined and recorded.

·         It must be cost-effective. The cost of undertaking a task over a period of time should be less than the total cost of the consequences of failure.

2.4.2.2 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT OPERATION MANAGEMENT

In the marine industry, managing vessel machinery and equipment operations is crucial to ensure safety, reliability, and efficiency; this involves ensuring that the equipment is operated according to the manufacturer's guidelines and best practices. In addition, proper operation, starting, and shutting down of equipment prevent damage and maximise equipment life.

As a comprehensive program, predictive maintenance provides valuable data for maintenance management, machinery and equipment operation management, and maintenance quality improvement. In addition, the program can be a critical production management tool on board and onshore. The data derived from the program can be used to increase vessel voyage capacity, vessel service quality, and overall effectiveness of the vessel function.

Optimum vessel efficiency is directly dependent on several machine-related factors. Predictive maintenance can provide data for consistent reliability, capacity, and efficiency from critical equipment and systems. However, many factors that affect vessels' efficiency are outside the maintenance function. These factors include standard operating procedures and operator errors. Therefore, the traditional evaluation methods of predictive maintenance are essential to determine the effects of these influences and achieve optimal vessel performance.

Predictive maintenance also benefits vessel management in terms of service quality and total costs. Regular evaluation of critical equipment and systems can anticipate potential problems resulting in reduced quality and increased costs. While the output of the predictive maintenance program is data, the information can be used to correct various problems affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of the vessel.

Therefore, predictive maintenance is essential in the marine industry to ensure vessel machinery and equipment's safe, reliable, and efficient operation. It provides accurate information for maintenance management and helps improve efficiency, product quality, and overall effectiveness.

2.4.2.3 MAINTENANCE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Maintenance quality improvement in the marine industry involves implementing strategies to improve maintenance quality and reduce maintenance costs, such as implementing preventive maintenance programs, optimising maintenance schedules, and reducing downtime. In addition, predictive maintenance can effectively identify the root causes of maintenance quality issues and reduce maintenance costs.

In addition, most safety and environmental incidents in the marine industry can be traced back to problems with equipment, systems, or procedures. Predictive maintenance can help identify and anticipate potential problems before they can result in incidents, thereby improving safety and environmental compliance.

A comprehensive program using predictive maintenance techniques such as vibration monitoring, thermography, tribology, process parameters, and operating dynamics can provide the data required to correct problems that may result in reduced product quality, safety incidents, or environmental violations. By implementing predictive maintenance, vessel operators can optimally maintain their equipment and machinery, reducing the likelihood of breakdowns, costly repairs, and safety incidents.

2.4.2.3.1  DETERMINING CONDITION-MONITORING MAINTENANCE TASK INTERVALS

Condition-monitoring maintenance task intervals must be determined based on the expected P-F interval. The following sources may be referred to as an aid in determining the P-F interval:

·         Expert opinion and judgment (e.g., manufacturer's recommendations)

·         Published information about condition-monitoring tasks (e.g., Appendix 1, RCM texts)

·         Historical data (e.g., current condition-monitoring task intervals)

2.4.2.3.1.1 CONDITION-MONITORING TASK INTERVAL

The interval for a condition-monitoring task should be set at no more than half the expected P-F interval and should be adjusted based on the following considerations:

·         Reduce the task interval if the P-F interval minus the task interval (based on 1/2 [P-F interval]) does not provide sufficient time to implement corrective actions.

·         Reduce the task interval if there is low confidence in the "guesstimate" of the expected P-F.

·         Reduce the task interval for higher-risk failure modes.

·         Set the task interval at half the expected P-F interval (or slightly above) for lower-risk failure modes.

2.4.2.3.1.2 INITIAL CONDITION-MONITORING TASK INTERVAL

Because few organisations will have detailed knowledge about the equipment failure mode P-F interval, the following guidelines can be used to establish initial condition-monitoring task intervals:

·         If an existing condition-monitoring task is being performed and has proven effective (e.g., no unexpected failures have occurred), use the existing task interval as the initial default task interval.

·         If an existing condition-monitoring task is being performed and some functional failures have occurred, adjust the task interval downward based on the experience.

·         If no existing condition-monitoring task is being performed or a new one is being proposed, the task interval must be based on the team's estimate of the P-F interval and guidelines provided in Paragraph 4/4.1. The following questions can help the team estimate the P-F interval:

o    How quickly can the condition deteriorate and result in a functional failure? Will it deteriorate in minutes, hours, days, weeks, months or years?

o    What is the capability of the condition-monitoring task in detecting the onset of failure? High or low?

o    How confident is the team in its judgment?

 

2.4.2.3.1.2  IMPROVING THE UNDERSTANDING OF P-F INTERVALS

As data from condition-monitoring tasks are collected, and corrective actions are implemented, a facility will improve its understanding of the P-F interval. For example, assume that vibration testing is performed weekly on pumps in a similar service. On several occasions, the vibration analysis detects the onset of failures. However, due to scheduling delays, corrective action is not taken for six (6) to eight (8) weeks. Nevertheless, during this delay, the pumps continue to operate appropriately. We then know that the P-F interval for these pumps is probably at least six (6) weeks, and the task interval can be changed to three (3) weeks (1/2 of six weeks). This is a rough form of age-exploration testing.

2.4.3.2 ESTABLISHING CONDITION-MONITORING MAINTENANCE TASK ACTION LIMITS

Another aspect of a condition-monitoring maintenance task is establishing action limits; this involves establishing limits that result in corrective actions when exceeded. The actions may involve any of the following:

·         Reperforming the condition-monitoring task to verify the results

·         Altering the task interval to ensure closer monitoring of the equipment

·         Initiating corrective actions to prevent the impending equipment failure

Establishing limits helps ensure that condition-monitoring tasks are effective in detecting and/or preventing the failure

2.4.2.4 PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES

Predictive maintenance techniques are essential for managing the maintenance of marine vessels. Vibration monitoring, thermography, tribology, process parameters, electric motor analysis, visual inspection, ultrasonic monitoring, and operating dynamics analysis are some techniques used in predictive maintenance programs. While vibration monitoring is a critical component of most programs, it is limited to monitoring mechanical conditions and not other critical parameters required to maintain the reliability and efficiency of machinery. Therefore, a comprehensive predictive maintenance program must include other monitoring and diagnostic techniques, such as thermography, tribology, process parameters, visual inspection, and other nondestructive testing techniques. These techniques can provide the data required to anticipate deviations from optimum operating conditions of critical vessel systems before they affect vessel safety, reliability, or efficiency. A successful predictive maintenance program should be able to reduce maintenance costs, optimise maintenance schedules, and minimise downtime. By identifying problems before they result in downtime, vessel owners and operators can minimise unscheduled breakdowns and ensure that repaired equipment is in acceptable mechanical condition.

2.4.2.4.1 VIBRATION MONITORING

Vibration monitoring is a crucial aspect of predictive maintenance for vessels. It involves measuring the vibration of equipment to determine its condition. Commercially available systems can monitor, trend, and evaluate the condition of all machinery/equipment on a vessel. Vibration analysis is the dominant technique used for predictive maintenance management, and it can be used to detect and identify incipient mechanical problems in critical machinery.

Recent advancements in microprocessor technology have made it cost-effective to implement vibration-based predictive maintenance programs in most maritime applications. In addition, these microprocessor-based systems have simplified data acquisition, automated data management and minimised the need for vibration experts to interpret data.

Most vibration-based predictive maintenance programs rely on one or more trending and analysis techniques, including broadband trending, narrowband trending, and signature analysis. By monitoring the vibration of plant machinery, a direct correlation can be made between the mechanical condition and the recorded vibration data of each machine on a vessel. Any degradation of the mechanical condition can be detected using vibration monitoring techniques, and vibration analysis can identify specific degrading machine components or the failure mode of plant machinery before severe damage occurs.

2.4.2.4.1.1 Broadband Trending involves measuring the overall vibration of equipment to detect changes in vibration levels. Broadband vibration monitoring is useful for acquiring vibration readings from select points on a vessel's machinery. This technique compares the acquired data with either a baseline reading taken from a new machine or vibration severity charts to determine the relative condition of the machinery. Generally, the unfiltered broadband measurement that provides the total vibration energy between 10 and 10,000 Hz is used for this type of analysis. However, it should be noted that broadband values must be adjusted to the actual operating parameters, such as vessel speed and load, to be effective. Changes in both the speed and load ( motor, pump) will directly affect the overall vibration levels of the machinery. While this technique can be used as a gross scan of the operating condition of critical machinery, it does not provide any information about the actual machine problem or failure mode. Therefore, it is essential to use other trending and analysis techniques, such as narrowband trending and signature analysis, to identify specific degrading machine components or the failure mode of the machinery.

2.4.2.4.1.2 Narrowband Trending involves measuring the vibration at specific frequencies to detect changes in vibration levels. Narrowband trending is a useful predictive maintenance technique for monitoring the condition of critical machine components in vessels. This technique involves monitoring specific vibration frequencies that represent machine components or failure modes, providing a quick and efficient means of monitoring the mechanical condition of these components.; this can include monitoring the condition of gear sets, bearings, and other components without manually analysing vibration signatures.

However, it is important to note that changes in speed, load, and other process parameters can directly and significantly impact the vibration energy produced by each machine component. Therefore, for narrowband values to be meaningful and effective, they must be adjusted to the actual machinery parameters; this will ensure that the data collected accurately reflects the condition of the machine components and allows for proper scheduling of maintenance tasks.

2.4.2.4.1.3 Signature Analysis involves analysing equipment's vibration spectrum to identify issues such as unbalance, misalignment, or bearing damage. Signature analysis is a valuable tool for predictive maintenance. It allows the identification of each frequency component a machine generates through visual representation. With proper training, vessel staff can use vibration signatures to determine the maintenance required for specific machinery/equipment. Many predictive maintenance programs utilise some form of signature analysis. However, most of these programs rely on comparative analysis instead of complete root-cause techniques, limiting the program's potential benefits. Therefore, it is crucial to incorporate a comprehensive approach that includes complete root-cause techniques to achieve maximum results. (FASIT, FMEA etc.)

 

2.4.2.4.2 THERMOGRAPHY

Thermography involves using thermal imaging to detect changes in equipment temperature.

Thermography is a useful predictive maintenance technique for monitoring the condition of plant machinery, structures, and systems on board tanker vessels.

Infrared technology is used to detect thermal anomalies and determine the operating condition of equipment by monitoring the emission of infrared energy, i.e., temperature. All objects emit infrared radiation with a temperature above absolute zero, and the intensity of the radiation is a function of the object's surface temperature.

The surface of an object affects the amount of emitted or reflected energy. Therefore, careful consideration of the actual emissivity of an object improves the accuracy of temperature measurements used for predictive maintenance. Most onboard equipment falls under the category of graybodies, which have an emissivity factor of less than 1.0. However, the actual emissivity factor for equipment varies due to variations in surface conditions, protective coatings, and other variables.

Thermographic techniques require special filters to avoid the negative effects of atmospheric attenuation of infrared data to ensure the accuracy of temperature measurements. Three general types of instruments can be used for predictive maintenance: infrared thermometers or spot radiometers, line scanners, and imaging systems. These instruments collect radiant energy and convert it into an electrical signal that is processed and displayed. An experienced and trained engineer can identify incipient problems within the vessel's machinery, structures, and systems by detecting thermal anomalies.

2.4.2.4.2.1 Infrared Thermometers involve measuring the temperature of equipment surfaces.

Infrared thermometers or spot radiometers can be helpful for predictive maintenance in the marine industry. They are designed to measure the surface temperature at a single point on a machine or surface. This technique can monitor critical points on vessel machinery or equipment, such as bearing cap temperatures, motor winding temperatures, and spot checks of process piping temperatures. In conjunction with other predictive maintenance techniques, such as vibration monitoring, point-of-use infrared data can provide valuable insights into the condition of the equipment and help prevent potential problems before they occur. However, it is essential to note that this technique is limited because it only provides temperature data for a single point on the machine or structure.

2.4.2.4.2.2 Line Scanners involve scanning equipment surfaces to detect temperature changes.

Line scanners can provide a larger field of view when monitoring the condition of the equipment. This type of infrared instrument provides a two-dimensional scan or line of comparative radiation, which can monitor the temperature distribution of critical components such as pipes, heat exchangers, and engines. While this technique is not as precise as spot radiometers, it can still provide valuable information for predicting maintenance needs and preventing equipment failures.

2.4.2.4.2.3 Infrared Imaging involves using thermal cameras to detect changes in temperature across large areas of equipment. Thermal or infrared imaging can be a valuable tool in predictive maintenance for the marine industry. This technique allows the scanning of complete machines, equipment, and systems, providing a wide area's thermal emission profile. The use of thermal imaging instruments can range from relatively inexpensive black-and-white scanners to full-colour microprocessor-based systems that provide the capability of store-and-recall thermal images, enabling a long-term predictive maintenance program.

Incorporating thermography into a predictive maintenance program for vessels can improve the reliability and efficiency of critical process systems that rely on heat transfer or retention, electrical equipment, and other parameters. Infrared techniques can detect potential issues in marine systems and equipment, including electrical switchgear, gearboxes, electrical substations, transmissions, circuit breaker panels, motors, hulls, bearings, and process systems that rely on heat retention or transfer. This application of thermography can help vessel operators detect and prevent failures or malfunctions, increasing safety and reducing downtime and maintenance costs.

2.4.2.4.3 TRIBOLOGY

Tribology is the study of the design and operating dynamics of the bearing-lubrication-rotor support structure of machinery, which is important for predictive maintenance in the marine industry. Several tribology techniques can be used for predictive maintenance on board tanker vessels, including lubricating oil analysis, spectrographic analysis, ferrography, and wear particle analysis.

Lubricating oil analysis is an important technique determining the condition of lubricating oils used in mechanical and electrical equipment. This analysis can provide an accurate breakdown of individual chemical elements, both oil additives and contaminants, contained in the oil. Comparing the amount of trace metals in successive oil samples can indicate wear patterns of oil-wetted parts in marine equipment and will indicate impending machine failure.

Recently, tribology analysis has become more efficient and cost-effective with the availability of microprocessor-based systems that can automate most of the lubricating oil and spectrographic analysis. Spectrographic or lubricating oil analysis can be used for quality control, reducing lubricating oil inventories, and determining the most cost-effective interval for an oil change. Lubricating, hydraulic, and dielectric oils can be periodically analysed using these techniques to determine their condition.

As a predictive maintenance tool, lubricating oil and spectrographic analysis can be used to schedule oil change intervals based on the actual condition of the oil. In the marine industry, this technique can result in a considerable annual reduction in maintenance costs. Frequent sampling and trending the data for each machinery on board the vessel is vital to obtain the full benefit of oil analysis, which can provide a wealth of information to base maintenance decisions.

2.4.2.4.3.1 LUBRICATING OIL ANALYSIS

Oil analysis has become essential to preventive maintenance on board ocean-going vessels. Therefore, laboratories suggest taking scheduled samples of engine lubricants to assess the condition of the critical lubricating film necessary for engine operation. Typically, ten tests are conducted on lube oil samples:

Viscosity is critical for lubricating oil in the main engine on board a vessel. Regular viscosity testing is necessary to determine if the oil has thinned or thickened during use. A comparison is made between the actual viscosity of used oil samples and an unused sample. Low viscosity can lead to reduced oil film strength, which weakens its ability to prevent metal-to-metal contact. On the other hand, high viscosity can impede oil flow to essential locations in the bearing support structure, reducing its lubrication capacity. Therefore, maintaining optimal viscosity levels is crucial for ensuring the longevity and reliable performance of the main engine.

Contamination. Oil contamination by water or coolant can lead to significant issues in the lubricating system. As many lubricant additives have elements similar to those used in coolant additives, accurate analysis of new oil is crucial for comparison to detect contamination. This issue can be crucial for the main engine in the marine industry, where contamination can lead to reduced engine efficiency and potentially costly repairs. In addition, regular oil analysis can help detect any contamination early, allowing for corrective measures to be taken.

Fuel Dilution. Oil dilution in a marine engine weakens the oil film strength, sealing ability, and detergency, leading to potential machinery failures. In addition, improper operation, fuel system leaks, ignition problems, improper timing, or other deficiencies may cause it. Fuel dilution is considered excessive when it reaches a level of 2.5 to 5 per cent, and it is crucial to monitor oil samples for any signs of dilution to prevent potential damage to the engine.

Solids Content. The solid particle count test is a standard test used to measure the percentage of solid materials present in a lubricating oil sample. The amount of solids in the oil can significantly impact the wear of lubricated parts in the engine. Therefore, an unexpected increase in the amount of solid particles reported in the analysis is a cause for concern and may indicate a potential problem in the lubrication system.

Fuel Soot. Fuel soot is always present to some extent in the oil used in diesel engines. Therefore, a test to measure fuel soot in diesel engine oil is vital since it indicates the fuel-burning efficiency of the engine. Infrared analysis is the most commonly used method for testing fuel soot in diesel engine oil.

Oxidation. Lubricating oil oxidation can cause the formation of lacquer deposits, corrosion of metal components, or thickening of the oil. Most lubricants contain oxidation inhibitors to prevent such problems. However, when these additives are depleted, the oil becomes susceptible to oxidation. An oil sample's oxidation degree can be measured using differential infrared analysis.

Nitration. Fuel combustion in diesel engines results in the formation of nitration products that are highly acidic and can cause deposits in combustion areas, accelerating oil oxidation. Infrared analysis is a common technique for detecting and measuring nitration products in lubricating oil samples. The presence of nitration products can indicate engine performance or fuel quality issues, and monitoring their levels can aid in predicting and preventing potential engine problems.

Total Acid Number. TAN (Total Acid Number) is a critical parameter for determining the acidity of lubricating oils. The acid number of unused oil is compared with that of a used oil sample to determine its acidic value. The presence of acids in lubricating oil can lead to corrosion of metal surfaces and other machinery components. Therefore, it is essential to monitor TAN regularly to ensure that the oil remains within acceptable limits.

Total Base Number. Total base number (TBN) measures an oil's ability to neutralise acidity. A higher TBN indicates a greater ability to neutralise acidity. In marine engines, low TBN can be caused by using the wrong type of oil for the application, waiting too long between oil changes, overheating, and using high-sulfur fuel. Therefore, regular analysis of TBN at specific intervals is crucial for evaluating the oil's effectiveness in neutralising acidity and preventing damage to the engine.

Particle Count. Particle count analysis is essential to predicting possible issues in hydraulic systems and other machinery. This type of analysis is distinct from wear particle analysis and is usually included in a routine lubricant analysis. High particle counts may indicate abnormal wear in machinery or the possibility of temporary or permanent blockages in orifices that could cause machine failures. However, the analysis is not designed to determine the size, wear patterns, or other factors that could identify the failure mode within the machine.

2.4.2.4.3.2 SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

The spectrographic analysis is a valuable tool for the marine industry to accurately and quickly measure the presence of wear metals, contaminants, and additives in lubricating oil. This information can help identify potential problems in machine-train components. However, it is important to note that spectrographic analysis alone cannot determine the specific failure modes of developing problems. Therefore, it should be used with other techniques in a comprehensive predictive maintenance program for marine vessels.

2.4.2.4.3.3 WEAR PARTICLE ANALYSIS

Wear particle analysis is an essential technique in marine predictive maintenance programs, as it provides direct information on the condition of the main engine. Studying particle shape, composition, size, and quantity in the lubricating oil can provide important information about the engine's mechanical condition. The wear particle analysis is conducted in two stages. The first stage involves routine monitoring and trending machine lubricant's solids content. Low levels of solids with a size less than 10 μm indicate a normal machine condition, while an increase in the number and size of particulate matter indicates the degradation of the machine's condition. The second stage involves the analysis of the particulate matter in each lubricating oil sample. The five basic types of wear that can be identified according to the classification of particles are rubbing wear, cutting wear, rolling fatigue wear, combined rolling and sliding wear, and severe sliding wear. Rubbing wear and early rolling fatigue mechanisms generate particles predominantly less than 15 μm in size. Wear particle analysis can help detect potential problems before they become major issues, allowing for timely maintenance and repair of the main engine.

Rubbing Wear. In the marine industry, rubbing wear is expected in the main engine and other machinery due to normal sliding wear. When a "wear" surface is broken, a unique layer is formed at the surface, which allows the surface to wear normally. However, if this layer is removed faster than it is generated, the wear rate and the maximum particle size also increase. If the lubrication system contains excessive contaminants, it can accelerate rubbing wear by over ten times without completely removing the mixed shear layer. Although catastrophic failure is unlikely, the machinery can wear out rapidly. An increase in wear particles can indicate impending trouble. Therefore, it is important to monitor the level of contamination in the lubrication system and take necessary actions to prevent excessive wear.

Cutting Wear Particles. These particles result from one surface penetrating another, typically due to misaligned or fractured hard surfaces producing edges that cut into softer surfaces or abrasive contaminants becoming embedded in soft surfaces and cutting opposing surfaces. Cutting wear particles is not normal and should always be investigated. If the particles are only a few micrometres long and a fraction of a micrometre wide, they are likely caused by contaminants. However, increasing quantities of longer particles are a warning sign of potential component failure and should be addressed promptly; this is especially important in the marine industry, where unexpected equipment failure can have serious consequences.

Rolling Fatigue. Rolling contact bearings are commonly used on marine vessels, making this information relevant to predictive maintenance for such machinery. Rolling fatigue wear can generate three types of particles: fatigue spall particles, spherical particles, and laminar particles. Fatigue spall particles are generated when a pit or spall opens up on a bearing surface due to rolling fatigue, and an increase in their quantity or size indicates an abnormality. Other sources can also generate spherical particles but are important because their presence is detectable before spalling occurs. Laminar particles are thin and often have holes, and they are thought to be formed by the passage of a wear particle through a rolling contact. While they may be generated throughout the life of a bearing, the quantity of laminar particles increases at the onset of fatigue spalling.

Combined Rolling and Sliding Wear. In the marine industry, this results from moving contact of surfaces in propulsion systems. These larger particles are generated from tensile stresses on the propeller surface, causing fatigue cracks to spread deeper before pitting. Propeller fatigue cracks do not generate spheres. Instead, propeller scuffing is caused by high loads or speeds, generating excessive heat that breaks down the lubricating film and causes adhesion of the mating propeller surfaces. As the wear surfaces become rougher, the wear rate increases. Once started, scuffing typically affects each propeller blade.

Severe Sliding Wear. This is caused by excessive loads or heat in a gear system, resulting in the breakaway of large particles from the wear surfaces. This can cause a rapid increase in the wear rate. If the stresses on the surface continue to increase, a second transition point is reached, causing the surface to break down and leading to catastrophic wear.

However, regular spectrographic analysis is limited to detecting particulate contamination with a size of 10 μm, or less, and larger contaminants are often ignored. This limitation can restrict the benefits obtained from this technique in identifying potential issues with machinery.

2.4.2.4.4 FERROGRAPHY

Tribology analysis is a valuable tool for predictive maintenance, but some limitations must be considered. Ferrography is a technique similar to spectrography, but it uses a magnetic field to separate ferrous or magnetic particles, making it better suited for larger contaminants up to 100 μm in size. However, one major limitation is the acquisition of accurate oil samples that genuinely represent the lubricant in the machine. Therefore, careful and consistent sampling techniques should be used to obtain representative samples from sample points consistent with detecting large particles, such as drawing samples before filtration and not from the bottom of a sump.

Sample frequency should be based on the mean time to failure from the onset of an abnormal wear mode to catastrophic failure. Sampling every 25 hours is recommended for critical machinery, while monthly sampling is adequate for most continuous-service equipment. However, for machines with extreme loads, weekly sampling is advised.

Interpreting analysis results is another limiting factor, as the terminology used can be unfamiliar to vessel engineers or attending maker technicians. It is crucial to have a good understanding of quantitative and qualitative chemistry to interpret tribology results accurately. Vessel engineering staff should be trained in basic chemistry and receive specific instructions on interpreting tribology analysis results.

2.4.2.4 PROCESS PARAMETERS

Many vessels do not consider machinery or system efficiency part of the maintenance responsibility. However, machinery not operating within acceptable efficiency parameters severely limits vessels' productivity. Therefore, a comprehensive predictive maintenance program should include routine monitoring of process parameters. As an example of the importance of monitoring process parameters, consider a vessel's main engine, which may be critical to its operation. Vibration-based predictive maintenance will provide the mechanical condition of the engine, and infrared imaging will provide the condition of the electric motor and bearings. Unfortunately, neither provides any indication of the operating efficiency of the engine. Therefore, the engine could operate at less than optimum efficiency, and the predictive maintenance program would not detect the problem.

Like the example cited, process inefficiencies are often a vessel's most serious limiting factor. Their negative impact on vessel productivity and profitability is often more significant than the total cost of the maintenance operation. However, many vessels do not recognise this unfortunate fact without regularly monitoring process parameters. If your program included monitoring the engine's fuel consumption, exhaust gas temperature, and cylinder condition, you could determine the operating efficiency. The brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) formula could be used to calculate the engine's fuel efficiency. The engine's power output can be estimated by measuring the exhaust gas temperature and cylinder condition. With these measured data, the efficiency can be calculated.

Process parameters monitoring should include all machinery and systems in the vessel's process that can affect its production capacity. Typical systems include the main engine, generators, pumps, boilers, fans, blowers, and other critical systems. The inclusion of process parameters in predictive maintenance can be accomplished in two ways: manual or microprocessor-based systems. However, both methods will normally require installing instrumentation to measure the parameters that indicate the actual operating condition of vessel systems. Even though most vessels have installed pressure gauges, thermometers, and other instruments that should provide the information required for this type of program, many of them are no longer functioning. Therefore, including process parameters in your program will require an initial capital cost to install calibrated instrumentation. Data from the installed instrumentation can be periodically recorded using either manual logging or a microprocessor-based data logger. If the latter is selected, many vibration-based microprocessor systems can also provide the means of acquiring process data. This should be considered when selecting the vibration monitoring system used in your program. In addition, some microprocessor-based predictive maintenance systems can calculate unknown process variables. For example, they can calculate the main engine's fuel efficiency used in the example. This ability to calculate unknowns based on measured variables will enhance an entire vessel predictive maintenance program without increasing the manual effort required. In addition, some of these systems include nonintrusive transducers that can measure temperatures, flows, and other process data without installing permanent instrumentation; this further reduces the initial cost of including process parameters in your program.

2.4.2.5 AI & MACHINE LEARNING USE IN PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE

In AI and machine learning, predictive maintenance refers to the ability to use volumes of data to anticipate and address potential issues before they lead to breakdowns in operations, processes, services, or systems. Having robust predictive maintenance tools enables owners and vessel operators to anticipate when and where potential service breakdowns can occur and respond to them to prevent service interruptions and accrue off-hire.

One example of AI and machine learning being used in predictive maintenance on board a tanker vessel is the application of a machine learning algorithm to analyse data from vibration sensors on the vessel's equipment. The algorithm is trained to recognise patterns in the data that indicate potential equipment failures, such as bearing wear or misalignment, and can alert maintenance personnel to maintenance or repairs before a failure occurs.

Another example is using AI to monitor and analyse real-time data from a vessel's engines and other critical systems. By using machine learning algorithms to identify patterns and anomalies in the data, the system can predict potential equipment failures or other issues before they occur, allowing for proactive maintenance and repairs.

2.4.2.6 ELECTRIC MOTOR ANALYSIS

Evaluation of electric motors and other electrical equipment is crucial for a comprehensive vessel predictive maintenance program. While vibration data can identify some mechanical and electrical problems in critical drive motors, it is insufficient for achieving optimum vessel performance. Thus, a predictive maintenance program for a marine vessel must include data acquisition and evaluation methods specifically designed to detect issues in motors and other electrical equipment.

2.4.2.6.1 INSULATION RESISTANCE

Insulation resistance tests are crucial in a comprehensive predictive maintenance program for vessels as they can reveal flaws in insulation, poor insulating material, the presence of moisture, and several other problems. Such tests can be conducted on the insulation of electrical machinery, from the windings to the frame to underground cables, insulators, capacitors, and other auxiliary electrical components. Various instruments such as meggers, Wheatstone bridges, Kelvin double bridges, and other specialised instruments can be used for conducting these tests.

Meggers are commonly used in the marine industry to measure the condition of motor insulation directly. This method uses a device that generates a known output, typically 500 V, and directly measures the insulation's resistance within the motor. When the insulation resistance falls below the prescribed value, the stator and rotor can be cleaned and dried to return to the required standards. However, the accuracy of meggering and most insulation resistance tests can vary widely with the parts' temperature, humidity, and cleanliness. Therefore, additional testing and inspections may be required to confirm the results of insulation resistance tests.

 

2.4.2.6.2 OTHER ELECTRICAL TESTING

A comprehensive predictive maintenance program for a marine vessel should include various testing and evaluation methods to monitor all critical vessel systems regularly. Along with routine vibration monitoring and oil analysis, the program should also include the following techniques:

·         Dielectric loss analysis: This method measures the electrical losses in insulating materials and can help detect moisture ingress, ageing, and contamination.

·         Gas-in-oil analysis: This test is used to identify any abnormal gases that may be present in the oil of power transformers and other electrical equipment. Certain gases can indicate a potential problem, such as overheating or arcing.

·         Stray field monitoring: Stray field monitoring can detect any magnetic fields that may be present outside of the normal magnetic circuits of electrical equipment, such as transformers or motors; this can help identify potential issues with equipment insulation or connections.

·         High-voltage switchgear discharge testing: This test detects any potential issues with high-voltage electrical equipment, such as switchgear or circuit breakers, that may be prone to arcing or discharges.

·         Resistance measurements: This technique measures the resistance of electrical components such as transformers, cables, and motors. Changes in resistance can indicate problems such as corrosion or degradation of insulation.

·         Rogowski coils: These sensors can measure electrical conductors' current without physically contacting the conductor. They are useful in monitoring current fluctuations in large motors or generators.

·         Rotor bar current harmonics: This test detects any issues with the rotor bars in AC motors, which can cause vibration and other mechanical issues.

2.4.2.6 VISUAL INSPECTION

Regular visual inspection of the machinery and systems on a vessel is necessary for any predictive maintenance program. In many cases, a visual inspection will detect potential problems that will be missed using other predictive maintenance techniques. Many potentially serious problems can remain undetected even with the predictive techniques discussed. Routine visual inspection of all critical vessel systems will augment the other techniques and ensure potential problems are detected before serious damage occurs. Most vibration-based predictive maintenance systems can record visual observations during routine data acquisition.

Since the incremental costs of these visual observations are small, this technique should be incorporated into all predictive maintenance programs. All equipment and systems in the vessel should be visually inspected regularly. The additional information provided by visual inspection will augment the predictive maintenance program regardless of the primary techniques used. This includes inspecting the hull, machinery, electrical systems, fuel and oil lines, valves, pumps, and other critical components.

2.4.2.7 ULTRASONIC MONITORING

This predictive maintenance technique utilises the same principles as vibration analysis but focuses on monitoring high-frequency ultrasound emissions rather than vibrations. Ultrasonic monitoring is particularly useful in detecting valves, piping, and other process system leaks. The range for ultrasonic monitoring is typically between 20,000 and 100 kHz, which is higher than the frequency range for vibration analysis.

Two types of ultrasonic systems can be used in predictive maintenance: structural and airborne. Airborne ultrasonic detectors can detect gas pressure leaks and locate vacuum leaks. They can operate in scanning and a contact mode, with a metal rod acting as a waveguide in the contact mode. Ultrasonic transmitters can also be placed inside plant piping or vessels to detect areas of sonic penetration along the container's surface.

While ultrasonic monitoring can detect machine dynamics such as gear meshing frequencies and blade pass, it cannot differentiate these from bearing frequencies, which are monitored by vibration analysis. Therefore, the use of ultrasonics to monitor bearing conditions is not recommended. Nevertheless, incorporating ultrasonic monitoring in a predictive maintenance program can provide additional insights into process systems and detect leaks that other techniques may miss.

2.4.2.8 OPERATING DYNAMICS ANALYSIS

This analysis method, tailored to the marine industry, is driven by vessel design and operating characteristics and is not limited to traditional analysis techniques. The diagnostic logic is derived from the vessel's machinery and systems' specific design and operating characteristics. Based on the unique dynamics of each vessel's machinery or system, all parameters defining optimum operating conditions are routinely measured and evaluated. Then, using the logic of normal operating conditions, operating dynamics can detect, isolate, and provide cost-effective corrective action for any deviation from optimum.

Operating dynamics analysis combines traditional predictive maintenance techniques into a holistic evaluation technique that will isolate any deviation from the optimum condition of critical vessel systems. This concept uses raw data derived from vibration, infrared, ultrasonics, process parameters, and visual inspection but applies a unique diagnostic logic to evaluate vessel systems. By using this method, operators can ensure that their vessel systems operate at peak efficiency, reducing the risk of costly failures and maximising the lifespan of the equipment.

2.4.2.8.9 MATHEMATICAL/DIGITAL TWIN

The use of mathematical/digital twins in predictive maintenance on board vessels is becoming increasingly popular in the marine industry. A digital twin is a virtual model of a physical system or asset created using data from various sensors and systems. This virtual model is used to predict how the physical system or asset will behave in different conditions and can be used to identify potential issues before they occur.

In the marine industry, digital twins can be used to monitor the performance of critical equipment such as engines, propulsion systems, and navigational systems. By analysing data from sensors and other sources, a digital twin can identify potential issues such as wear and tear, corrosion, and other forms of damage. This allows maintenance crews to take proactive steps to prevent problems before they occur, reducing the risk of downtime and costly repairs.

One example of the use of digital twins in the marine industry is in the monitoring of engine performance. By creating a digital twin of the engine, data from sensors can be analysed to predict when maintenance is required; this can help crews to schedule maintenance more efficiently, reducing the risk of downtime and ensuring that the engine operates at optimal levels.

Another use of digital twins in the marine industry is monitoring ship systems such as ballast tanks and cargo holds. By creating a digital twin of the ship, data from sensors can be analysed to predict when maintenance is required, such as when tanks need to be cleaned or when corrosion is likely to occur; this can help to reduce the risk of damage to the ship and ensure that it operates safely and efficiently.

2.4.2.10 OTHER TECHNIQUES

Several nondestructive techniques are available to identify potential marine equipment and systems issues. However, some techniques may not provide comprehensive coverage or be too costly to support a predictive maintenance program. Therefore, these techniques can confirm failure modes identified by other predictive maintenance methods discussed in this chapter. Some techniques that can complement predictive maintenance in the marine industry include acoustic emissions, eddy currents, magnetic particles, residual stress, and traditional nondestructive methods.

2.4.3 PROGRAM COSTS

Establishing and maintaining a comprehensive predictive maintenance program for marine vessels will involve initial and recurring costs. The costs will depend on the technology and system chosen for the vessel. Although the initial or capital cost may be more visible, the recurring labour, training, and technical support required to maintain a total program will be the program's actual cost. When evaluating the program's cost, it is essential to consider the long-term benefits of implementing a predictive maintenance program, such as increased equipment reliability, reduced downtime, and improved safety.

2.4.3.1 VIBRATION MONITORING
The capital cost for a vibration-based predictive maintenance program on a vessel will vary depending on the specific techniques and equipment required. It may range from $4,000 to more than $50,000 initial cost. Training is a critical component of a successful predictive maintenance program based on vibration monitoring and analysis. Even simplified programs that rely on trending or comparison techniques require a practical knowledge of vibration theory for meaningful interpretation of machine conditions. Advanced techniques such as signature and root-cause failure analysis require knowledge of machine dynamics and failure modes. Therefore, personnel involved in predictive maintenance programs on vessels should receive appropriate training to ensure effective implementation and interpretation of results.

2.4.3.2 THERMOGRAPHY

Point-of-use infrared thermometers and infrared imaging systems are available in the marine industry for monitoring the temperature of equipment and machinery. On average, a point-of-use infrared thermometer costs less than $200, while infrared imaging systems range from $800 for a basic FLIR scanner (colour-imaging system )to over $10,000 for EX-proof one. Training is critical for these imaging systems to obtain accurate data and interpret the results. In addition, factors impacting the accuracy and consistency of thermal data must be accounted for, and a solid understanding of thermal imaging theory and application is required for effective analysis.

2.4.3.3 TRIBOLOGY
The capital cost of spectrographic analysis instrumentation for marine vessels is typically too high to justify in-plant testing. For example, a microprocessor-based spectrographic system for marine applications can cost between $30,000 and $60,000. Therefore, most predictive maintenance programs for vessels rely on third-party analysis of oil samples. Simple lubricating oil analysis by a testing laboratory can range from about $20 to $50 per sample, depending on the type and scope of analysis required. The standard analysis will typically include viscosity, flash point, total insoluble, total acid number (TAN), total base number (TBN), fuel content, and water content. More detailed analysis using spectrographic or ferrographic techniques, including metal scans, particle distribution (size), and other data, can range up to well over $150 per sample, depending on the complexity of the analysis.

2.4.3.4 ULTRASONICS

Most ultrasonic monitoring systems are scanners that do not provide long-term trending or storage of data, and they are used as point-of-use instruments that indicate the overall amplitude of noise within the instrument's bandwidth. Therefore, the cost of this type of instrument is relatively low. Typically, ultrasonic instruments cost between $1,000 and $8,000. While ultrasonic techniques require minimal training for leak detection, caution should be exercised in applying this technique in a predictive maintenance program. In addition, many ultrasonic systems are sold as bearing condition monitors, even though the natural frequencies of rolling-element bearings fall within the bandwidth of ultrasonic instruments. However, this is not a reliable technique for determining the condition of rolling-element bearings. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the selected ultrasonic system is appropriate for the specific application and to use it accordingly.

2.4.3.5 AI & MACHINE LEARNING

The cost of implementing AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance will depend on the size and complexity of the vessel and its equipment. The cost can range from tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for a smaller vessel and millions for a larger vessel with more advanced technology.

The initial cost of implementing AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance on a vessel can include the cost of hardware, software, sensors, and data storage systems. The cost of training personnel to operate and maintain the system should also be considered. Additionally, ongoing costs such as software licensing, maintenance, and upgrades should be considered.

Despite the initial cost, implementing AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance can provide significant cost benefits over the long term. The technology can help identify potential equipment failures before they occur, allowing for timely repairs and minimising downtime. It can also help optimise maintenance schedules and reduce the need for manual inspections, which can save time and money.

2.4.3.5 BENEFITS

Properly implemented predictive maintenance can significantly benefit the marine industry beyond just scheduling maintenance tasks. Predictive maintenance, based on operating dynamics, can yield substantial results. Using the four major loss classifications, first-year results from a maintenance improvement program based on a comprehensive predictive maintenance program for vessels may include the following:

2.4.3.5.1 BREAKDOWN LOSSES

In the first year of implementation on boar VLCC, a comprehensive predictive maintenance program reduced vessel delays from machine and system breakdowns. All critical systems and machinery onboard the vessel reflected a marked reduction in total delays. Therefore, limiting the scope of unscheduled delays and reducing scheduled maintenance time is crucial.

Accepting planned delays for maintenance arbitrarily restricts available employment time, and historical data should not be the sole reason for planned maintenance downtime. A comprehensive predictive maintenance program for vessels and marine systems must incorporate specific methods to evaluate all delays and downtime to achieve 100 per cent availability.

2.4.3.5.2 QUALITY DEFECTS

In the first year of a comprehensive predictive maintenance program implemented on board the VLCC tanker, the number of Oil Major ( BP, Exxon, Total) rejects, voyage diversions, and delays were reduced, resulting in a decrease in negative costs associated with poor vessel performance by more than $5 saving per ton of fuel used for sailing. Over the next two years, the costs associated with poor service quality were further reduced.

2.4.3.5.3 AVAILABILITY FACTOR

Setup and adjustment, reduced speed, start-up losses, and operating efficiency of vessel processes directly affect the overall vessel availability factor. Reduction of these major losses, in conjunction with the reduction in delays and rejects, can result in an overall increase in vessel availability for employment. Implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program as part of a total vessel improvement program can significantly improve net operating profit.

2.4.3.5.4 MAINTENANCE COSTS

Traditional maintenance costs such as labour and materials are important factors in any predictive maintenance program. Implementing a predictive maintenance program based on operating dynamics can significantly reduce labour and material costs. Traditional predictive maintenance applications may not reduce overall maintenance costs within a vessel environment. Instead, they may only slightly decrease overall costs, while material costs such as bearings and couplings may increase.

 

References & Bibliography:

 

1.       https://www.datarobot.com/wiki/predictive-maintenance/#:~:text=In%20AI%20and%20machine%20learning,processes%2C%20services%2C%20or%20systems.

 

Disclaimer:

Out of Box Maritime Thinker © by Naro Consilium Group 2022 and Aleksandar Pudar assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this paper. The information in this paper is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, or timeliness or of the results obtained from using this information. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your company's situation or system or consulting a consultancy professional. The content of this paper is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only.

2.13. PRESCRIPTIVE MAINTENANCE

2.13.1 INTRODUCTION 2.13.1.1 DEFINITION Prescriptive maintenance in marine engineering is an evolution of maintenance strategies, meldin...