1.5 EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE: ORGANISATIONS
By Aleksandar
Pudar
Technical Superintendent
and Planned Maintenance Supervisor Reederei Nord BV
Co-founder of "Out of Box
Maritime Thinker Blog" and founder of Narenta Gestio Consilium Group
Many different types of organisational
structures are used in the maritime industry, but not all effectively utilise
the workforce and may have too few or too many indirect personnel. This section
provides practical knowledge for evaluating the existing organisational structure
to determine its effectiveness.
An effective organisation is composed of
people with a purpose working together toward a common goal. Planning a
corporate organisation is both a science and an art. The dimensions of
structure, culture, systems, and processes are common to all maritime organisations.
However, how these dimensions are coordinated and governed is more art than
science, and there is neither a clear guideline nor a single ideal
organisational structure that is best for all maritime organisations.
A fundamental principle of organisation
is that the pieces or functions must fit together, and there should be
effective coordination between functions. As a system, organisations can only
be understood or governed as an integrated whole. The performance of individual
functions, such as technical, financial, crewing, operations, or chartering,
cannot provide an accurate picture of the entire organisation.
Organisations must maintain integrity and
balance policy and practice, philosophy and performance, and decisions and
deeds. One serious problem that limits maritime organisations' performance is
that many have failed to recognise the interrelationship of functions, with
each operating separately without coordination or communication with other
functions.
To improve performance, the success of
the maintenance function depends on the participation and total commitment of
all employees within the company. Various approaches are used to gain employee
involvement, such as suggestion systems, information sharing, training, and
survey feedback. While these methods may positively impact overall performance,
a core group with the authority and responsibility for program implementation
is necessary for long-term employee commitment. In addition, care should be taken
to ensure that organisational change is not perceived as another quick-fix
management solution.
1.5.1 FUNCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Each position within the company has
specific responsibilities that must be enforced as part of
an effective reliability excellence
change process. These responsibilities include :
Responsibilities of maintenance supervision (Ch.
Eng, 2nd Eng, VMT)
·
Control over quality, duration, cost, and
thoroughness of work:
o
Time lost between jobs due to maintenance
during off-hire.
o
The vessel must be ready for subsequent
employment at all times.
o
Follow up on breakdowns and machinery
/equipment getting offline.
o
Balance motivation and discipline.
o
Regular safety rounds
o
Significant jobs supervised by senior
engineers.
• Training and motivation:
o
Identify and provide or obtain the skills
training required by each crew member.
o
Give adequate time and attention to
formal and on-the-job training. Never neglect the development of employees.
o
Act upon requests for support and help.
Effective listening reduces grievances.
·
Tactical decisions to stay on schedule:
o
Refine and finalise labour, materials,
priorities, and methods.
o
Tactics often must be established after
the job start.
o
Communicate with the technical
department, operations, and makers (as necessary)
·
Administrative or personnel functions:
o
Control tardiness
o
Assure reasonably accurate distribution
of time and materials to specific jobs.
o
Prompt and fair handling of grievances.
Responsibilities of Maintenance Planning and
Scheduling
Planning is concerned with preparing work
to be done in the future. In the case of most maritime organisations, this is
set up within software ( PMS). Usually, set-up is done by Planned Maintenance
Supervisor; specific responsibilities may
include:
·
Liaison with internal and external
stakeholders for nonemergency work, as appropriate
·
Job plans and estimates
·
Man hours required for a specific job
·
Ensures that records are maintained
appropriately
·
Reports on performance versus goals
Responsibilities of Reliability Engineering
(vessel management team)
The role of reliability engineering is to
apply technical expertise and innovation to resolve equipment issues that cause
excessive downtime and maintenance work. The position is dedicated to the
maintenance function and focuses on eliminating repetitive failures.
·
Ensure that new installations are
maintainable.
·
Identify and correct chronic and costly
equipment/machinery problems, and eliminate repetitive failure.
·
Provide technical advice to the crew and
liaise between the equipment manufacturer and crew.
·
Design and implement an effective and
economically justified preventive or predictive maintenance program.
·
Ensure proper operation and care of
equipment.
·
Implement a comprehensive lubrication
program.
·
Conduct inspections, make adjustments,
replace parts, overhaul equipment, and perform other maintenance tasks for
selected equipment.
·
Conduct vibration and other predictive
analyses.
·
Protect equipment from environmental
factors.
·
Maintained and analysed equipment data
and historical records to predict maintenance needs.
1.5.2 KEY CONSIDERATIONS OF ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURE
In order to establish an organisational
structure that fosters reliability, the following key considerations should be
taken into account:
·
Clearly establish organisational
principles and ground rules.
·
Technical management should have a
structure that is on par with operations management.
·
Technical ( maintenance) should not be seen as subordinate to
operations.
·
The maintenance function should be viewed
as a supportive service rather than a subordinate one.
·
Define the roles, responsibilities, and
authorities of each department, including:
o
Operations department
o
Technical department
1.5.3 SELF-DIRECTED WORK TEAMS
In the vessel management business, lean
vessel management is a becoming adopted approach prioritising efficiency over
wasteful practices. Crewing practices are critical in implementing and
institutionalising lean methods onboard and onshore. One practical approach
involves organising crew and onboard engineers into self-directed or
self-managed work teams.
A Vessel Management Team should consist
of senior vessel management and TSI, PMS MSI, and Purchasing Officer members
from the office side to achieve an integrated, customer-driven management
process. Team members are cross-trained in various tasks within the defined
process and gradually expand their capabilities to include administrative and
support roles. As the team matures, it becomes increasingly autonomous and
requires minimal supervision.
Self-directed work teams are similar to
the lean management philosophy but have two key distinctions. First, lean
management teams focus on continuously improving and relentlessly eliminating
unnecessary costs, while self-directed work teams allow the onboard crew to
take on additional responsibilities for administrative and managerial tasks.
Second, lean managers expect team members to cross-train in all skills within
the team's boundaries, whereas self-directed teams recognise that human
limitations cap the number of different competencies any individual can master.
Therefore, each rank within a
self-directed team is responsible for its specific role, and the team leverages
all its crew members' diverse and complementary skills to ensure it has all the
needed competencies with just enough redundancy. This approach emphasises
teamwork, empowerment, participation, flexibility, and cooperation.
Implementing Self-directed Work Teams
Setting up self-directed work teams is an
evolutionary process consisting of four significant steps:
(1) cross-training, (2) enhancing
teamwork skills, (3) participating in proactive improvement
efforts, and (4) developing
administrative skills.
Cross-training: Crew members need to learn how to perform various tasks within the
responsibilities of their team and department. Cross-training enables the team
to rotate job responsibilities and relieve boredom. Additionally,
cross-training ensures team members can substitute for other crew members on
short notice.
Enhancing teamwork skills: Crew members must learn or improve their skills in cooperation,
conflict resolution, communication, negotiation, and consensus formation. These
skills are crucial for effective teamwork and collaboration.
Participating in proactive improvement
efforts: Management should empower crew members to analyse
processes and develop and implement ideas to improve quality, increase
productivity, and reduce waste.
Developing administrative skills: Team members must develop support and administrative skills, including
maintenance and repair, quality control, scheduling, purchasing, inventory
control, personnel management, performance measurement, and personal computer
skills.
Continuous improvement, motivated
workers, overcoming resistance to change, and appropriate incentives are critical for successful self-directed work teams. However,
managers and crew members should never lose sight of the purpose of adopting
self-directed work teams to improve the quality of production and business
processes continuously. Developing incentive structures that reward the right
behaviours and undermine resistance to change can support the self-directed
team concept.
Senior managers must provide the vision
and leadership to spark change to ensure a smooth transition. Additionally,
securing vessel managers' buy-in is crucial to overcoming resistance to change.
However, it is essential to remember that this process takes time, and setbacks
are inevitable. Therefore, teams should not take on too much responsibility too
quickly.
1.5.4 MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
Best
practices for maintenance inclusion in organisational structure are directly
dependent on factors such as operations business plans, maintenance work types,
and the like.
1.5.4.1 OPERATIONS
BUSINESS PLAN
In the
context of the oil tanker business, it is essential to establish a maintenance
organisation that can meet the demands of the vessel's operations. The
maintenance organisation structure should be designed to support continuous
operation and ensure effective planning and scheduling of maintenance
activities.
For
instance, if the vessel is operated 24 hours per day, seven days per week, the
maintenance organisation should be structured to support this mode of
operation. The maintenance workforce should be distributed to ensure continuous
operation, and maintenance activities should be scheduled to take advantage of
any available "windows of opportunity" when the vessel employment
permits sustaining maintenance activities.
1.5.4.2 MAINTENANCE
TYPES
Corrective
Corrective maintenance occurs when an
issue is noticed; in essence, it is nonscheduled maintenance tasks which result
from:
·
Additional findings from the scheduled
tasks accomplished at specified intervals of time or usage
·
Reports of malfunctions or indications of
impending failure (including automated detection)
This second group of tasks aims to maintain or restore
Corrective maintenance may be done in the:
·
Emergency. Owners or vessel operators must provide timely responses to
emergency work requests without adversely affecting the vessel's ability to
utilise the workforce or negatively impacting total maintenance
cost-effectively. In most cases, this requires an organisation structure that
dedicates a small percentage of the workforce, as well as planning and
supervisory support, to emergency response work
·
Reaction, i.e. Reactive maintenance, is done when a total failure or breakdown
occurs.
Preventive
Preventive maintenance is an absolute
requirement of asset reliability and effective management of vessel life cycle
costs. Therefore, an effective company must dedicate a portion of its craft
workforce time, planning, and supervisory support to consistent, timely
execution of preventive maintenance activities.
Preventive
maintenance tasks include failure-finding tasks scheduled at specified
intervals or based on condition. The objective of these tasks is to identify
and prevent deterioration below inherent safety and reliability levels by means
such as:
·
Lubrication or servicing
·
Operational, visual, or automated checks
·
Inspections, functional tests, or condition monitoring
·
Repairs
·
Discard or disposal
This group of tasks is determined by
reliability-centred management (RCM) analysis and comprises the RCM-based
preventive maintenance program.
Predetermined/Planned maintenance is set
up per machiner/equipment maker requirements, schedules, statutory class rules,
and industry standards. It includes Periodic Rebuilds and Overhauls. Without
exception, machinery/equipment and the vessel require periodic overhauls or
rebuilds to replace worn parts and finite-life components and ensure that
acceptable reliability levels are consistently maintained. Because of the
liability or risk and higher skill levels associated with major rebuilds or
overhauls of significant equipment, the organisation must ensure that the
best-qualified technicians are utilised for this type of work. Usually, this is
outsourced to the maker with a supervisor from the owner representative.
Condition-based
Condition-based maintenance is a technique or a
maintenance strategy that uses condition-monitoring tools and techniques to
track equipment performance during regular operation to detect and fix possible
defects before they fail. Condition-based maintenance is done when a situation
or machinery/equipment condition indicates maintenance is needed.
Predictive-based maintenance, together with risk-based maintenance
Predictive
maintenance uses condition-monitoring equipment to evaluate equipment
performance and, based on results, identifies whether the equipment needs to be
maintained. The Internet of Things (IoT) is critical to this process. IoT
allows different assets and systems to connect, work, share, analyse and action
data.
Predictive
and risk-based maintenance are two important approaches to managing
maintenance.
Predictive-based
maintenance uses data and analytics to predict when equipment will likely fail
so that maintenance can be scheduled before the failure occurs. This approach
is based on the principle that performing maintenance before a failure occurs
is more cost-effective than performing corrective maintenance after a failure.
On the
other hand, risk-based maintenance considers the potential consequences of a
failure when determining maintenance schedules. This approach prioritises
equipment that poses the most significant risk to safety, the environment, or vessel
employment.
Both
approaches are complementary and can be used together to optimise maintenance
practices. For example, predictive-based maintenance can help identify
potential equipment failures, while risk-based maintenance can help prioritise
maintenance activities based on the potential impact of equipment failure.
Using
both approaches, organisations can achieve a more proactive and efficient
maintenance strategy that minimises downtime, reduces costs, and improves
safety and environmental performance.
Prescriptive maintenance
Prescriptive
maintenance, a revolutionary approach in the maintenance sector, has
significant potential for application within the maritime industry. This
strategy is all about harnessing the power of data analysis, predictive
modelling, and machine learning to anticipate potential faults before they
escalate into severe failures, thereby advising on the most effective actions
to optimise equipment performance and maintenance routines.
Prescriptive
maintenance is a paradigm shift from conventional maintenance methods. It is
fundamentally about turning insightful data into meaningful action.
Prescriptive
maintenance uses advanced analytics to predict potential failures and suggests
optimal maintenance strategies. It's an approach that goes beyond simply
predicting problems, aiming instead to prescribe the right interventions.
Prescriptive
maintenance can lead to significant cost savings and enhanced system
reliability. It minimises unplanned downtime and extends the lifespan of
equipment, which is vital for operations at sea where immediate professional
help is not always available.
Prescriptive
maintenance presents a proactive approach to vessel maintenance, aligning with
the maritime industry's shift towards digitalisation and smart technologies. By
predicting and preventing potential issues before they occur, vessels can
increase operational efficiency, decrease downtime, and enhance safety, all
critical factors in the maritime environment.
1.5.4.3 OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS
·
Work execution.
·
Planning and scheduling.
·
Maintenance engineering.
·
When one component of any organisation
maximises, the organisation sub-optimises.
·
Application of technical knowledge.
·
Consider the nature of maintenance work
and its control.
·
Consider the impact of technological
advancements on the nature of maintenance.
1.5.5 SUPERVISION
AND SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS
Unlike
operations, reliance on self-directed or self-managed teams does not work well
in maintenance because the nature of maintenance work does not lend itself to
natural work teams and must rely on more traditional organisational structures
for success. The following information provides guidelines for an effective
organisational structure.
Best Maintenance Organisation Practices
To
support effective identification, prioritisation, planning, and execution of
maintenance activities, the organisation structure must provide direct and
indirect support to the crew. The span of control for these support activities
includes the below managements divided per number of vessels.
·
Technical Superintendent - one TSI for
five vessels
·
Planned Maintenance Supervisor – one PMS
for 20 vessels
·
Fleet Manager – one FM for 40 vessels
·
Maintenance/ Training/Technical
assistants: one for 40 vessel
·
On board, standard crew complement should
be followed.
Note: Maintenance duties and responsibilities
are defined within IMS for each rank (both onshore and vessel).
References
& Bibliography :
1. Swatkowski, P. (2018) The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
Maintenance Organisations - Emerson, www.emerson.com. Emerson
Reliability Consulting. Available at:
https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/-7-habits-of-highly-effective-maintenance-organizations-en-5259570.pdf
(Accessed: March 30, 2023).
Disclaimer:
Out
of Box Maritime Thinker © by Narenta Gestio Consilium Group 2022 and Aleksandar
Pudar assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the
content of this paper. The information in this paper is provided on an "as
is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, or
timeliness or of the results obtained from using this information. The ideas
and strategies should never be used without first assessing your company's
situation or system or consulting a consultancy professional. The content of
this paper is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes
only.